101 of the 427 listed companies we recently studied in 10 African countries are listed subsidiaries of listed holding companies. By market capitalisation they represent just over 36% or US$23bn of the total US$65bn of equities in our universe of companies. In many instances, in fact the majority, these subsidiaries are part of multi-national corporations with listings on the World’s top stock exchanges.
The mindset of the management of a listed subsidiary is different to that of other companies with different ownership profiles. Compliance, conformance, internal policies, group procedures, group strategy meetings dominate the governance arena. There are strict rules and regulations for many areas of a listed subsidiary’s operations and governance and a read of the governance sections of the related holding company annual report, or websites, will reveal World class commitment to good governance standards and disclosure. The latter includes electronic disclosure and proactive use of the Internet and annual report services
Listed subsidiaries of listed holding companies are liked by investors because typically there’s “big daddy” in the background and continuity of management. Listed subsidiaries of listed holding companies are mostly listed for political reasons; to mitigate the accusations of them being foreign investors “reaping the dividends” at the expense of the local economy. When indigenous residents also “reap” the same dividends it’s difficult for politician to attach the same level of rhetoric to such accusations. So a broad shareholder policy makes sense. If this is the case why are the online disclosure practices of listed subsidiaries of listed holding companies so far behind their holding company practices? Why aren’t the same practices at holding company level applied at subsidiary level? Simple indicators such as the following
- are the latest annual reports online?
- is there comprehensive information on the company online?
- is there basic investment data online?
- is information on the company up to date?
- is there an IR contact?
I have thought about this for a long time and I have yet to work it out. I have a mental block on this. But I have a few thoughts:-
- is it because it’s Africa? Most Africans don’t have computers so why bother?
- is it a case of the value of a subsidiary’s equity being irrelevant at holding company level?
- is it a case of they just have not thought about it? mmmm….
- is it a case of “there is no regulation so we don’t have to do anything?
- is it a case of “our African operations are miniscule compared to our overall group so is it really worth it?”
- is it a case of “why highlight our operations if we don’t have to?”
- is it a case of “you just can’t get the skilled staff in Africa so we view the Internet as a risk rather than an asset”?
- do shareholders in Africa count less than shareholders at holding company level? Are the benefits of engagement immaterial because of the ignorance of retail shareholders?
I don’t know.
Our study covered Nigeria, Ghana, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Uganda, Kenya, Namibia, Tanzania and Mauritius and was carried out at the beginning of January 2o10.
Continue Reading